2018) ('Section 1227 defines 'eportable aliens,' a synonym for removable aliens. 2007) (noting that 'the terms 'deportable' and 'deportation' can be used interchangeably with the terms 'removable' and 'removal,' respectively.') Tima v. ^ 8 U.S.C.§ 1229a(e)(2) ('The term 'removable' means-(A) in the case of an alien not admitted to the United States, that the alien is inadmissible under section 1182 of this title, or (B) in the case of an alien admitted to the United States, that the alien is deportable under section 1227 of this title.') see also Lolong v.^ 8 U.S.C.§ 1452(b) ('Application to Secretary of State for certificate of non-citizen national status proof oath of allegiance').
830, 855-56 (2018) (JusticeThomas concurring) ('The term 'or' is almost always disjunctive, that is, the s it connects are to be given separate meanings.') Chalmers v. 2018) ('Citizenship and nationality are not synonymous.') Jennings v. non-citizen national status procedure') see also 8 U.S.C.§ 1101(a)(22) ('The term 'national of the United States' means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States.') (emphasis added) Black's Law Dictionary at p.87 (9th ed., 2009) (defining the term 'permanent allegiance' as 'he lasting allegiance owed to by its citizens or s.') (emphasis added) Ricketts v. ^ 8 U.S.C.§ 1452 ('Certificates of citizenship or U.S.shall have authority to administer such oath of allegiance to persons residing within the jurisdiction of the court.' Section 310(b)(5) defines 'eligible court' for this purposes as 'a district court of the United States in any State' or 'any court of record in any State having a seal, a clerk, and jurisdiction in actions in law or equity, or law and equity, in which the amount in controversy is unlimited.' ^ Section 310(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act provides that 'an eligible court.The USCIS retracted their demand after receiving a letter from an atheist group that objected based on Welsh vs. This judgement was used in 2013 to reverse a denial of citizenship to Margaret Doughty, a 65 year old British atheist who had lived in the United States for 30 years, unless she could show proof of membership in a church with pacifist beliefs to support her claim that she was a conscientious objector entitled to omit the Oath's clause about bearing arms.
0 kommentar(er)
